Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s latest attack against Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) is underscoring the alarm over the state of the U. S. military’s weapons stockpiles more than two months into the war with Iran.
Hegseth accused Kelly, a Navy veteran and a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), of divulging classified information regarding key U. S. munitions during his appearance on a Sunday news show, putting a spotlight not only on his ongoing feud with the Arizona Republican but also on the high-usage rate of premier munitions against Tehran and the time it will take to replenish them.
“Let’s put aside that the general thrust of munition depletion is not classified, and Kelly did not go near the details. For Hegseth to bicker over classification rather than address the core argument Kelly makes suggests Hegseth simply can’t argue on the facts,” said Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official who is now a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. “It’s the national security equivalent of going ad hominem on a debate opponent when you’re poorly matched on knowledge, ability and content.”
The new chapter of the feud kicked off when Kelly said he and his Senate colleagues received a “detailed” briefing on the stockpiles of long-range Tomahawk missiles; Terminal High Altitude Area Defenses (THAADs), which are used to shield against short, medium and intermediate-range missiles; Precision Strike Missiles (PrSMs); and Standard Missile 3 (SM-3s.), ship-based surface-to-air missiles.
“I think it’s fair to say it’s shocking how deep we have gone into these magazines, because this president got our country into this without a strategic goal, without a plan, without a timeline, and because of that, we’ve expended a lot of munitions,” Kelly said on CBS.
“As for how long it will take to replenish those reserves,” the Arizona senator said. “We’re talking about years.”
In response, Hegseth said Kelly, a former Navy pilot and NASA astronaut, was “blabbing on TV (falsely & dumbly) about a *CLASSIFIED* Pentagon briefing he received.”
“Did he violate his oath…again,” Hegseth wrote in a social platform X post on Sunday, adding that the Pentagon’s legal counsel “will review” his comments to the network.
Kelly responded Sunday night, sharing a video from Hegseth’s recent testimony in front of SASC that showed the Arizona Democrat asking the Pentagon chief how long it will take for the U. S. military to replenish its weapons stockpiles.
“I think that’s exactly the right question, too, senator,” Hegseth told Kelly at the time. “Because the time frame we were existing under was unacceptable. And what this budget does, I mean, months and years. I mean, we’re building new plants in real time.”
Hegseth added the specific timeline for replenishment of those munitions — including JASSM, precision-guided cruise missiles — “depends on the weapon system” and slammed the Biden administration for sending munitions to Ukraine.
Rachel E. VanLandingham, a national security law expert and former Air Force active duty judge advocate who has been critical of Hegseth’s leadership of the Pentagon, said Hegseth’s threat is part of an “ongoing campaign” against Kelly and the Pentagon’s potential case against the senator has “no legal leg to stand on.”
“Show me what classified information that he revealed. Show me. Show me something that wasn’t already in the public arena. There isn’t anything there,” VanLandingham said in an interview with The Hill on Monday.
But Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.), a Hegseth ally who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, agreed with the Pentagon head, saying Kelly needs to be “held accountable now.”
Kelly and Hegseth have locked horns before.
Hegseth attempted last year to reduce Kelly’s retired captain’s rank and sent Kelly a formal letter of censure after the Arizona lawmaker appeared alongside five other Democrats, all with either military or intelligence backgrounds, telling service members that they can refuse illegal orders.
The Arizona senator sued the Pentagon, and a federal judge in February blocked the department’s actions against Kelly, saying retired service members have First Amendment protections. Last week, a three-judge panel on the U. S. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit appeared skeptical of the administration’s argument in the case.
More broadly, the jab from Hegseth underscores the state of the U. S. weapons magazines. The military has burned through thousands of missiles since Feb. 28, when the conflict with Iran began, diminishing the munitions that would be needed in a potential future conflict with China amid escalating tensions with Taiwan.
Experts, former defense officials and lawmakers have warned that the war with Iran has depleted the U. S.’s global supply of munitions, with the Pentagon having to pull weapons from other regions to ensure there’s an ample stash in the Middle East.
Last month, U. S. Indo-Pacific Command Commander Adm. Samuel Paparo told SASC members that it could take years to build such high-cost munitions.
“I think it will take one to two years for them to scale,” Paparo told senators, adding that “it won’t be soon enough. There are finite limits to the magazine, and I have all the faith in the world that they’re being employed judiciously.”
The military has used up nearly half of its stockpile of Patriot interceptor missiles, fired more than half of its THAADs and expanded over 45 percent of its PrSMs during the war with Iran, an April analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) found.
VanLandingham, now a law professor at Southwestern Law School, argued that instead of sparing with Kelly, Hegseth could better justify the Pentagon’s massive $1.5 trillion defense budget request by leaning into the need to use the funds to replenish the depleted stockpiles.
“That would be the smart thing to do. Instead of making this something personal with Senator Kelly, that just trivializes it and distracts from the real question here, which is, does the Pentagon really need this money,” she said. “Is the United States in a weaker position vis-à-vis China right now, because of our diminished stockpile?”
Rubin agreed, saying that while the spat with Kelly is “petulant” and “not smart,” helping ramp up U. S. production of munitions is not just on the Pentagon, but a task for Congress as well.
“There simply is no substitute for also ceasing talking about it, and just doing it,” he told The Hill. “The perfect can’t be the enemy of the good, and the endless bickering over what’s perfect leads to the worst possible outcome and, in this case, a Secretary of War temper-tantrum.”
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.