"The evidence appears to reveal the time at which he entered to commit the murder."

Following a re-examination of an environmental interception from 2017, the Pavia Public Prosecutor's Office, in the new investigations into the Garlasco murder case, which concluded recently, has also concluded that Andrea Sempio, in one of his soliloquies, "appears to be referring to the time he would have arrived at the victim's house on the day of the murder." In the transcript of the audio recording from February 8, 2017, the 38-year-old says: "Something happened that day... she was always there at home... but damn... at nine thirty." According to Stasi, Chiara never spoke of "advances" or Sempio. According to Alberto Stasi, Chiara never mentioned any approaches related to the strange phone calls she received, nor did she express any suspicions about Andrea Sempio. This was stated during his testimony to investigators on May 20, 2025, as reported today by Corriere, Repubblica, Stampa, Giornale, Giorno, and Provincia Pavese. "Did Chiara ever mention any approaches related to those strange calls she received a few days before the murder?" "No, she didn't." Alberto Stasi answered. The then-boyfriend, who was sentenced to 16 years, was questioned by investigators on May 20, 2025. Did she tell him about it? "No, she didn't. Reasoning hypothetically, I believe it would have depended on other factors: whether she considered it important at that moment, or whether she wasn't distracted by other things." Stasi recalls mentioning advances from a colleague. Prosecutor Fabio Napoleone asked him if Chiara had ever mentioned the suspect Andrea Sempio. "No." And did he have any reason to believe that someone might have seen the intimate videos? "As far as I know, no, even after all this time." Did Chiara suspect that her brother had noticed? "I tend to rule that out." The new "BPA" (presumably a forensic analysis report), according to Corriere, also states that "there are 'new' traces on the basement stairs... Among these are marks in the shape of an inverted 'C', with square corners, found in several places. For investigators, this is likely the result of the weapon, smeared with blood, being placed on the ground. There is also a trace that is significant. It is on the edge of the pool of blood at the entrance. No one had noticed it before. It appears to be the imprint of a hand, a left palm, left in blood. There is no fingerprint (to compare). But, according to investigators, it is the killer's. Only he could have left it." Reproduction reserved © Copyright ANSA